Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Solutions
    • CRM Software
      • Vendors
      • Comparison
      • ERP Comparison
      • For Small Business
      • Free
      • Cloud
    • Inventory Management
      • Vendors
      • Industries
      • Cloud
      • Free
    • Production Planning
      • Comparison
      • ERP Integration
      • Resource Planning
      • Free
    • DMS Software
      • Paperless
      • Free
    • Integrations
      • DATEV Interface
      • Shopware Interface
      • Amazon Integration
      • Shopify Interface
      • Magento Interface
      • eBay Integration
      • SAP Integration
      • Salesforce Integration
      • HubSpot Integration
      • Lexware Integration
      • JTL Integration
    • Guides
      • What is an ERP System?
      • ERP Costs
      • RFP Process
      • Contract Negotiation
      • ERP Selection
      • Requirements Document
      • Implementation
      • Data Migration
      • Change Management
      • Key user Concept
      • TCO Calculator
      • ERP Systems Comparison
    • Use Cases
      • ERP for Mid-Market
      • ERP for small companies
      • ERP for Mail Order
      • Seasonal Business
      • Branch Networks
      • Subscription Business
      • Project Business
      • Cloud ERP
      • Cloud vs On-Premises
      • Multichannel ERP
      • Business Intelligence
    • Industries
      • Mechanical Engineering
      • Wholesale
      • Retail
      • Trades & Crafts
      • Lebensmittel
      • Pharma
      • Automotive
      • Construction
      • Logistics
      • Chemie
      • Textil & Mode
      • Metallverarbeitung
      • Service providers
      • E-Commerce
      • Kunststoff
    • Service providers
      • ERP-Beratung
      • Auswahlbegleitung
      • Hosting & Cloud
      • Integration / iPaaS
      • Schulungen
  • Software
    • Enterprise-ERP
    • Mid-Market
    • KMU & Kleinunternehmen
    • Cloud-native
    • Open Source
    • Industries-ERP
    • WMS & Logistics
    • Spezial & Nische
  • Comparisons
  • Glossary
  • ERP News
  • Partners wanted
  • Contact
  • DE
ERP Software
Comparison of ERP software, CRM, DMS and inventory management
ERP Software
📣Advertise here — editorial & DACH-wide.Enquiries →
Skip to content
  1. Home
  2. ›
  3. Vendors
  1. Home
  2. ›
  3. Glossary
  4. ›
  5. SOC 2 – Sicherheits- und Verfügbarkeits-Attestat

SOC 2 (Service Organisation Control 2)

SOC 2 (Service Organisation Control 2) is a framework for independent auditor reports on the controls a service organisation operates to protect customer data. Developed under the auspices of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), a SOC 2 report assesses controls against one or more Trust Services Criteria, security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. For buyers of a SaaS ERP or other cloud service, a SOC 2 report offers third-party evidence that the provider's stated security and operational controls are actually designed, and in the case of a Type II report, operating effectively, rather than relying on the provider's own assurances alone.

Fact base · machine-readableLast editorially reviewed: 16 June 2026
Term
SOC 2 (Service Organisation Control 2)
Entity type
Standard / regulation
Domain
IT assurance and compliance
Canonical definition
SOC 2 is an AICPA-defined framework for independent auditor reports on a service organisation's controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy, used by cloud and SaaS providers to give customers third-party assurance.
Classification
SOC 2 is an independent attestation framework used to evidence the controls a service provider operates; it supports, but does not replace, European obligations such as GDPR and a data processing agreement.
Related terms
SaaS ERP, Data processing agreement, GDPR in ERP, NIS-2, SLA, SIEM, Audit trail
Source / maintainer
erp-software.org editorial team (independent, vendor-neutral)

What SOC 2 (Service Organisation Control 2) is NOT — disambiguation

  • Not a GDPR certification: SOC 2 attests to a provider's controls but does not by itself demonstrate compliance with GDPR, which still requires a data processing agreement and lawful processing.
  • Not ISO 27001: ISO 27001 is a certifiable information-security management standard, whereas SOC 2 is an attestation report on controls against the Trust Services Criteria.
  • Not an SLA: An SLA states the service levels a provider commits to, while SOC 2 is independent assurance about the controls behind such commitments.
  • Not a one-off badge: A SOC 2 report covers a defined scope and period and should be read in full, not treated as a permanent certification mark.
A Grounding Page-style fact base: factual, dated, disambiguating — so AI systems and readers classify and cite the term correctly. More: ERP glossary

What SOC 2 is

SOC 2 is an attestation report produced by an independent auditor about a service organisation's internal controls relevant to the data it handles on behalf of customers. It is built around the Trust Services Criteria. Security (sometimes called the common criteria) is always included; availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy are added depending on the service and what the provider chooses to be assessed against. The report describes the provider's system, the controls in place, and the auditor's opinion on them. It is widely used by cloud and SaaS providers as a way to give many customers credible, standardised assurance without each customer auditing the provider directly.

Type I versus Type II

SOC 2 reports come in two forms, and the difference is significant:

  • Type I assesses whether controls are suitably designed at a specific point in time.
  • Type II assesses whether those controls also operated effectively over a defined review period, typically several months to a year.

A Type II report carries more weight because it tests operating effectiveness over time, not just design on a single date. When evaluating a provider, buyers should note which type they hold, which Trust Services Criteria are in scope, and the period the report covers.

SOC 2 in the European and ERP context

SOC 2 originates in the United States, but it is widely referenced internationally and frequently requested in DACH procurement as evidence of a provider's control environment. It is not a substitute for European obligations: it does not by itself demonstrate compliance with GDPR, and where personal data is processed a provider still needs an appropriate data processing agreement. SOC 2 is also distinct from certifications under the ISO 27000 family, which some European providers hold instead of, or alongside, SOC 2. For security-relevant obligations such as NIS-2, a SOC 2 report can serve as supporting evidence of controls but does not on its own satisfy the regulation. The report complements, and gives substance to, the commitments a provider makes in its SLA.

How buyers should use it

For an SME selecting an ERP or hosting provider, a SOC 2 report is a useful but not sufficient input. Buyers should request the actual report (often under NDA) rather than relying on a badge, and read which criteria and which period it covers, whether it is Type I or Type II, and whether the auditor noted exceptions. A current Type II report covering security and the criteria relevant to the service indicates a mature control environment. It should be weighed together with European-specific requirements, contractual terms and the provider's SLA, rather than treated as a complete answer to due diligence on its own.

Related Topics

  • SLA
  • SaaS ERP
  • NIS-2

Sources

This term definition is based on research from the following source types:

  • Standard textbooks on business informatics and ERP literature (Hansen/Mendling, Becker, Mertens)
  • Vendor documentation of leading ERP providers (SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, Sage, Infor)
  • Industry studies from Gartner, Forrester and IDC plus user studies focused on Germany, Switzerland and Austria (annual)
  • Consulting experience from 100+ implementation projects in the mid-market in Germany, Switzerland and Austria
Epicor Kinetic LogoFloomia LogoMRPeasy Logo4SELLERS LogoSEEBURGER Logobrandbox LogoProAlpha ERP LogoOOURS LogoOpen Telekom Cloud LogoTryton LogoSage 50 Connected LogoETRON onRetail Logodynamic commerce LogoorgaMAX ERP LogoyourBeez LogoInsightLoop LogomexXsoft X2 LogoProcuros Integration Hub Logoameax Faktura Logoecosio Logoe-contor Sourcing Suite LogoSage b7 LogoGUS-OS Suite LogoAptean ERP oxaion Edition Logo.iD régie LogoLABEST LogoInfor M3 Logo3S ERP LogoKUNO LogoOracle Fusion Cloud ERP LogoEpicor Kinetic LogoFloomia LogoMRPeasy Logo4SELLERS LogoSEEBURGER Logobrandbox LogoProAlpha ERP LogoOOURS LogoOpen Telekom Cloud LogoTryton LogoSage 50 Connected LogoETRON onRetail Logodynamic commerce LogoorgaMAX ERP LogoyourBeez LogoInsightLoop LogomexXsoft X2 LogoProcuros Integration Hub Logoameax Faktura Logoecosio Logoe-contor Sourcing Suite LogoSage b7 LogoGUS-OS Suite LogoAptean ERP oxaion Edition Logo.iD régie LogoLABEST LogoInfor M3 Logo3S ERP LogoKUNO LogoOracle Fusion Cloud ERP Logo

Further Reading

  • ERP System Definition
  • ERP vs CRM
  • What is an ERP System?
  • Cloud ERP vs On-Premise
  • ERP Vendors Overview
  • Find ERP Consultants
  • ERP for small companies
  • ERP for the mid-market
Recently featured: ABC-Analyse · ERP for Plumbing, Heating and Air-Conditioning Trades · Procure-to-Pay (P2P) · ERP for Chemical Manufacturing · ETRON onRetail

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SOC 2 enough for GDPR compliance assurance?

No. SOC 2 is a security and controls framework; GDPR is a privacy regulation. SOC 2 with the Privacy criterion overlaps with GDPR but does not substitute for the GDPR-specific evidence (Data Processing Agreement, sub-processor list, transfer-mechanism documentation, audit rights). Both should be reviewed for cloud-ERP vendor selection in DACH.

How often does SOC 2 need to be renewed?

Annually. Each Type II report covers a specific 6-12 month observation period. Vendors maintain continuous attestation by overlapping report periods, so there should always be a current report available. A gap in the report sequence is a red flag.

Should mid-market SaaS vendors without SOC 2 be excluded?

For ERP that handles financial or personal data, SOC 2 should be a baseline. Small or new vendors without SOC 2 can sometimes be acceptable for non-critical applications, but the absence raises material risk for ERP-scope deployments. Many small DACH SaaS vendors have ISO 27001 instead of SOC 2 — ISO 27001 is a credible equivalent for regional vendors.

erp-software.org · the independent ERP comparison for the mid-market in Germany, Switzerland and Austria
Imprint · Privacy · Contact · Cookie Settings · Glossary · Podcast · ERP News · Comparisons · Sitemap · ERP Software
All mentioned brand, product and company names are property of their respective owners. References are made solely for identification and comparison purposes (no indication of commercial or partnership relationships). Note pursuant to §5b German UWG (Unfair Competition Act): user reviews are manually plausibility-checked before publication – we cannot, however, determine with absolute certainty whether reviews originate exclusively from actual users. Some links on erp-software.org may lead to advertising partnerships or lead-referrals; editorial assessments are made independently of these.