OLAP Analysis — Multidimensional Data Analysis
OLAP analysis is the interactive examination of business figures held in a multidimensional structure, using the operations that OLAP technology makes possible. Where OLAP names the underlying model and engine, OLAP analysis is the activity an analyst performs: viewing measures such as revenue or contribution along dimensions such as time, product, region and customer, and moving fluidly between summary and detail. The aim is to answer business questions, for example why a margin moved or which region drove a change, by slicing, drilling and pivoting through the data rather than by requesting a new fixed report for every question.
- Term
- OLAP Analysis (Multidimensional Data Analysis)
- Entity type
- Method / planning logic
- Domain
- Business intelligence and reporting practice
- Canonical definition
- OLAP analysis is the interactive exploration of multidimensional data using operations such as slice, dice, drill-down, roll-up and pivot to examine business measures along several dimensions.
- Classification
- OLAP analysis is the analytical activity performed on the multidimensional structures provided by OLAP technology, typically over a data warehouse.
- Related terms
- OLAP, Data warehouse, Power BI, ABC analysis, ETL, EPM, Consolidation
- Source / maintainer
- erp-software.org editorial team (independent, vendor-neutral)
What OLAP Analysis (Multidimensional Data Analysis) is NOT — disambiguation
- Not the OLAP engine: OLAP analysis is the activity of exploring data, whereas OLAP is the underlying multidimensional technology and model.
- Not static reporting: OLAP analysis is interactive, letting the user follow a chain of questions, rather than producing a fixed pre-defined report.
- Not planning or forecasting: It explains current and historical figures; forward-looking planning is a separate process.
- Not data mining: OLAP analysis is user-driven exploration of known dimensions, not the algorithmic discovery of hidden patterns.
What OLAP analysis involves
OLAP analysis treats a data set as a cube of measures indexed by dimensions and explores it through a standard repertoire of interactions:
- Drill down and roll up — move from an aggregate, such as annual revenue, to its components by quarter, month or day, and back again.
- Slice and dice — restrict the view to one dimension value or to a sub-cube across several dimensions.
- Pivot — swap which dimensions appear on rows and columns to change the perspective.
- Drill through — jump from an aggregated figure to the underlying detailed records.
This interactivity is the point: an analyst follows a line of reasoning across many steps in seconds, which would be impractical with static, pre-defined reports.
Typical business questions
OLAP analysis is well suited to questions that combine several dimensions and need both totals and detail. Examples in an SME context include sales by product line and region over time, margin development by customer segment, stock turnover by warehouse and period, or budget-versus-actual at successive levels of an organisation. It frequently sits alongside specific analytical methods such as ABC analysis and supports consolidation and planning work in enterprise performance management.
Where the data comes from
The figures explored in OLAP analysis are rarely read directly from the operational ERP. They are usually extracted, cleansed and reshaped through an ETL process into a data warehouse, then exposed as a cube or semantic model. The quality of the analysis depends heavily on this preparation: consistent dimensions, clear measure definitions and reliable refresh timing determine whether different reports agree. Front-end tools, including platforms such as Power BI, provide the visual surface through which users carry out the analysis.
Good practice and pitfalls
Effective OLAP analysis depends on agreed definitions. If two analysts mean different things by "revenue" or use different period boundaries, the same cube can produce conflicting answers, which is why a governed model and a clear set of definitions matter as much as the tooling. Common pitfalls include:
- Inconsistent dimension hierarchies that make drill-down misleading.
- Stale data, where the refresh schedule is not understood by users.
- Confusing analysis with planning: OLAP analysis explains the past and present, while forward planning belongs to dedicated planning processes.
Done well, OLAP analysis gives decision-makers a self-service way to interrogate consistent figures; the structure they explore is provided by the OLAP engine and the warehouse behind it.
Related Topics
Frequently Asked Questions
Is OLAP still relevant in 2026?
Yes, although the implementation has shifted. Classic dedicated MOLAP servers (Essbase, TM1) are still in production at large enterprises but no longer the default choice for new projects. Modern setups use cloud data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) with semantic layers (dbt, Cube.dev, Looker) that expose OLAP-style dimensional models to BI tools. The conceptual model — dimensions, measures, hierarchies, slicing, drill-down — remains the same; the storage and compute have moved to the cloud.
Does our ERP system include OLAP?
Larger ERPs ship with embedded analytics that internally use OLAP-style aggregation: SAP S/4HANA Embedded Analytics on top of HANA, Microsoft Dynamics 365 with Power BI integration, Oracle Fusion ERP with Oracle Analytics Cloud. Mid-market ERPs typically expose a data export interface and rely on an external BI tool. For complex cross-system analytics — ERP plus CRM plus web shop plus accounting — an independent data warehouse with its own OLAP layer is the standard architecture.
MOLAP, ROLAP or HOLAP — which one for our project?
MOLAP gives the fastest query response and works well for stable, well-understood KPI cubes with limited data volume (under a few hundred GB). ROLAP scales further, handles billions of rows in modern cloud warehouses and avoids cube-rebuild times, but pays a per-query compute cost. HOLAP combines both: pre-aggregated summaries in MOLAP for the hot metrics, detailed drill-through hitting the ROLAP warehouse on demand. For most mid-market projects in 2026 the simplest answer is ROLAP on a cloud warehouse with a semantic-layer tool — the operational complexity of separate MOLAP infrastructure is rarely worth it.
