myfactory and Haufe X360 are two DACH cloud-ERPs targeting similar SMB customer profiles. Both emphasise German market fit with cloud-native delivery and broader operational scope. The differentiation comes from platform philosophy and ecosystem orientation. This comparison covers practical differences for DACH SMB-and-mid-market cloud-ERP evaluations.
Vendor positioning
myfactory: Schweinfurt-headquartered DACH cloud ERP. Approximately 6,000 customers in DACH. Focused on trade, service business and integrated CRM with marketing automation. Haufe X360: Haufe Group's DACH-marketed cloud ERP built on Acumatica xRP platform. Strong Haufe ecosystem integration. Acumatica platform brings international capability underneath DACH branding. Both products target DACH SMB-and-mid-market with cloud-native delivery.
Functional comparison
myfactory strengths: integrated CRM with mailing automation, trade-and-distribution focus, established DACH partner network. Haufe X360 strengths: Haufe ecosystem connectivity (Lexware Lohn, Haufe HR), broader scope including manufacturing, Acumatica-platform features. Where myfactory wins: trade-focused operations, marketing-driven customer engagement, traditional DACH SMB patterns. Where Haufe X360 wins: Haufe-ecosystem-centric organisations, manufacturing-touching operations, Acumatica-platform comfort.
Selection considerations
Both products are credible mid-market cloud-ERPs for DACH SMB. myfactory for: marketing-and-customer-engagement-driven SMB operations, trade and distribution focus, established DACH SMB patterns. Haufe X360 for: organisations using Haufe ecosystem, manufacturing-touching operations, broader scope needs. Common alternatives: weclapp (cloud-native DACH-built), Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Microsoft alignment), Xentral (e-commerce-focused). The DACH SMB cloud-ERP market has several credible options; specific operational fit drives the decision.
Ecosystem and pricing
Both products are cloud-native SaaS with subscription pricing. myfactory pricing: typically 40-80 EUR per user per month. Haufe X360 pricing: comparable mid-market pricing with Acumatica-specific configurations affecting cost. Partner networks: myfactory has dedicated DACH partner network; Haufe X360 operates through Haufe-aligned partners. Both networks are credible for DACH SMB implementations.
Implementation and partner considerations
Implementation factors beyond functional fit. Partner-network quality: the implementation partner often matters more than the product within a peer set. Both products typically have multiple credible DACH partners; evaluating partner-specific team CVs and project references matters substantially. Reference customers in your industry segment provide independent perspective on real operations. Project timeline expectations: typical mid-market implementations run 4-12 months for SMB-and-lower-mid-market scope, 6-18 months for upper mid-market with greater complexity. Compressed timelines consistently produce post-go-live issues. Cost ranges: total project cost typically 100,000-1,500,000 EUR for relevant customer-size range. Specific cost differences across products typically 20-40%; partner-side bidding produces additional 15-25% variation.
Long-term operational considerations
Three patterns for long-term operations. (1) Roadmap investment: evaluate vendor investment trajectory. Products with strong roadmap and growing ecosystem deliver compounding long-term value. (2) Skills availability: products with larger user-bases have larger pools of available IT-skilled professionals. Specialist products with smaller installed-bases produce talent-acquisition friction. (3) Upgrade cadence: cloud-SaaS products receive automatic updates; on-premises products require customer-managed upgrade projects every 2-5 years. Cumulative cost-and-effort over 5-10 years matters substantially. The right selection reflects not just current capability but long-term operational sustainability.
Best-fit scenarios
myfactory typically fits when: the organisation is a DACH SMB with 20-80 users, marketing-and-customer-engagement operations are central, the customer prefers a Schweinfurt-based vendor with predictable roadmap, and deployment can move quickly with limited customisation. Haufe X360 typically fits when: the customer is a service-business or project-driven organisation (consultancies, agencies, professional services), the operation needs strong project accounting and time and expense workflows, and customers value the Acumatica engine underneath with its transparent customisation model. Both products serve adjacent SMB profiles; the operational pattern (product-and-marketing versus project-and-service) drives selection.
Decision matrix
Practical criteria that resolve most evaluations. (1) Project-based service operations → Haufe X360. (2) Product-and-marketing-driven operations → myfactory. (3) Open customisation via xRP framework needed → Haufe X360 (Acumatica xRP). (4) Native marketing automation in the same product → myfactory. (5) International multi-entity rollout planned → Haufe X360. (6) Pure DACH single-entity operations → either. (7) Cost-driven SMB selection below 25 users → myfactory typically lower TCO. The pattern of answers usually points one way clearly.
Pricing approach
myfactory is pure subscription, priced per named user with module tiers. Indicative range 40-90 EUR per user per month for typical SMB configurations. Haufe X360 uses an Acumatica-style transaction-volume-plus-resource pricing model that scales with operational throughput rather than seat count, which makes it more cost-effective for organisations with many casual users (project managers, service technicians, executive dashboards). For organisations with primarily heavy daily users (warehouse, customer service), the per-user model in myfactory tends to be more predictable. Implementation services typically run 1-3x first-year subscription for either product.
What are the main differences between the two systems?
The key differences in architecture, industry fit, customization depth and licensing model are compared in the main section of this page. The exact configuration depends on the industry, company size class and customization depth of the specific ERP setup. A well-founded answer always requires a look at the individual business processes and the strategic IT roadmap.
Which system is better suited for the mid-market?
Mid-market suitability differs by company size (SMEs with 50 employees, classic mid-market with 250 employees, upper mid-market with 1,000+). Suitability per size class is presented in the main section — see also ERP for the mid-market. The exact configuration depends on the industry, company size class and customization depth of the specific ERP setup.
How long does a migration between the two systems take?
ERP migrations typically take 6–18 months. With significantly different data models, it can take longer. Read more under ERP implementation.
What do existing customers say about the two systems?
The Trovarit ERP study and vendor references provide qualitative data. You will find our own reviews on the vendor pages above. The exact configuration depends on the industry, company size class and customization depth of the specific ERP setup.
What customization options do the two systems offer?
Customization depth varies greatly — cloud solutions are usually more restricted, while on-premise systems can often be fully adapted at source-code level. See the main comparison section for details. The exact configuration depends on the industry, company size class and customization depth of the specific ERP setup.
